Ohio sports teams seek exemption from foreign land ownership restrictions
COLUMBUS — Major Ohio sports franchises are lobbying state lawmakers for an exemption from proposed legislation that would restrict foreign ownership of agricultural and other strategic lands in the state.
The push comes as the Ohio General Assembly considers House Bill 47, which aims to limit foreign entities from purchasing farmland and property near military installations and critical infrastructure. Sports teams argue the broad language could impact their operations and future investment opportunities.
Representatives from several Ohio professional sports organizations have met with legislators in recent weeks to discuss potential language that would create exemptions for sports and entertainment venues, according to sources familiar with the discussions.
Proposed Restrictions Target Strategic Assets
House Bill 47 would prohibit foreign adversaries and their affiliates from acquiring agricultural land, property within 10 miles of military installations, and land near critical infrastructure including airports and power plants. The legislation defines foreign adversaries as China, Russia, Iran, North Korea, Cuba, and Venezuela.
Supporters say the measure protects Ohio’s food security and national defense interests. The bill has gained bipartisan support amid growing concerns about foreign investment in American agricultural assets.
“We need to ensure that hostile foreign nations cannot gain control over our state’s most important resources,” said Rep. Derek Merrin, R-Monclova Township, who chairs the House Agriculture Committee.
Sports Industry Raises Concerns
Ohio’s professional sports teams worry the legislation’s current language could complicate future partnerships with foreign investors or sponsors. Several franchises have existing relationships with international companies that could be affected by the restrictions.
The teams have not publicly disclosed specific concerns but are working with lobbyists to ensure sports and entertainment facilities receive appropriate exemptions, sources said. Ohio is home to major league teams including the Cincinnati Bengals, Cleveland Browns, Columbus Blue Jackets, and Cincinnati Reds.
Industry representatives argue that sports venues serve different purposes than agricultural land or military-adjacent property and should not face the same restrictions. They contend that foreign investment in sports franchises can bring economic benefits to local communities.
Legislative Timeline and Next Steps
House Bill 47 is currently under review in the House Agriculture and Rural Development Committee. Committee members are expected to consider amendments in the coming weeks, including potential exemptions for various industries.
The legislation must pass both chambers of the General Assembly before reaching Gov. Mike DeWine’s desk. DeWine has not publicly commented on the sports teams’ exemption request.
Similar legislation has been enacted in other states, with varying approaches to exemptions for different sectors. Florida, Texas, and other states have passed foreign land ownership restrictions in recent years, often with specific carveouts for certain industries.
The Ohio Farm Bureau Federation supports the legislation, saying it addresses legitimate national security concerns. Agricultural groups argue that foreign control of farmland could threaten food production and rural communities.
Legislative hearings on the bill are expected to continue through April, with potential committee votes scheduled for later this month.
Sources: Ohio Capital Journal
